[Justin Miller]

The narrative portion of the season is over. Now, it's about systems, matchups, and structural advantages. A deep playoff run is a series of tactical chess matches, and not every coach has the pieces to compete.

Let's move beyond the standings and break down the on-ice product.

Tical Audit:

Edmonton: System: High-flying, rush-based offense. Playoff Liability: Their defensive zone coverage and susceptibility to a strong forecheck can be systematically exploited in a seven-game series.

NY Rangers: System: Reliant on elite goaltending and a potent power play. Playoff Liability: Their middling 5-on-5 possession numbers suggest they can be beaten at even strength, forcing them to be perfect elsewhere.

Boston: System: Structurally sound, defensively responsible, and relentless on the puck. Playoff Liability: Against teams with elite, shutdown center depth, their lack of a dominant #1 pivot could stifle their offensive generation.

Which teams have the system and the personnel to win the tactical battles that define playoff hockey?

...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...